-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUl/GSAAoJEGmiD1Cb5K7pyioP/14RmKs/f3Ywu6AblXUjMgXU
mZy+RId2eq5xQ+6mVieE1xK+8a5aKwkixekUBX5kB99acvIHfU36J2KIIs6BkuZa
7RAq5XAC8h2TmJVCXsSmhFxKBKdvDfp0lhXvdgPt59BCLxDPTdUDUAyWl29Zodai
pdJU2PR/Nb/f45WQVo22bHF890I5vgCnMiSjhGytrPNcm4p1Hilr8UeG5cDPZtNA
JjrXmCD8rNJh9IYFGVxtvl3EpqQ2SDSJOiYPTAR9PjPOOvQM8U8w4ZlpsxEv8eRA
+94tfqs1UxJgF69hV36zMw8sICWhehD0TgZsYbUoOYf2YZeO0AguUJOg9eNXZa+F
y3BxLMpZU0TkWTtKZ3wtu3xwrs5rm2o2USHqWt10AFIm26D1UkkgE1TodfmY+1xB
4DKzJpXnCF3dcf2K8+cSgho8llpFGDGu+J07CFR8c6kN8qdVX1zsYj7MtVBZnipH
mC8pHxkSP8P4Xznc0lhWyX8II1/5y9kXwFOEDMJNDeXfCRSuIdHtPoF9KAhZZy4K
MVIxmShz7WRCG5DU+Mo2lWTqX1ChYnE88m7gad79zQfiIzKdNaKTVvwcYLCzVh31
BX9GvOU2Alu8uI2H5yNpWMeMNSWVugtwXO2f3QzCUOsYl7nec1HCIEQFsK/Uwe5V
0JNSp6YFiSpNzwcWlDbf
=R5sA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Chances are good it is vulnerable:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.0.0/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntpd.c?view=log <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.0.0/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntpd.c?view=log>
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.1.0/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntpd.c?view=log <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.1.0/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntpd.c?view=log>
Regarding the diff:
diff -ru ntp-dev-4.2.7p486-RC ntp-4.2.8 |wc -l
7723
Cherry picking the patches is easier.
ntpd source trees:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-dev/ <http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-dev/>
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.2/ <http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.2/>
Luckily that is still up… atm ntp.org is down.
Here is the cached version of the notice: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice
--
Steve Clement
https://www.twitter.com/SteveClement
mailto:steve@localhost.lu
.lu: +352 20 333 55 65
> On 22 Dec 2014, at 11:06, Steve Clement <steve@localhost.lu> wrote:
>
> If someone could share a diff between ntpd 4.2.7 and 4.2.8 would be a good start.
No comments:
Post a Comment